Legal FAQs

Back
Home
Next

 

 

 

Getting Disengaged – Breach of Promise

Whenever a leap year approaches, many ladies may be planning to ask ‘for their boyfriend’s hand in marriage’ on the 29th of February. What they may not realise, however, is that until relatively recently if a young lady (or gentleman) asked her beau (or lady love) for their ‘hand in marriage’ and the other party accepted, then they had entered into what was in essence a legal contract, with all the usual consequences should it be broken.

You would have thought that such ‘Breach of Promise’ actions disappeared with the crinoline and Queen Victoria, the fact is they didn’t. In the late 19th century, several Bills were introduced in the House of Commons, seeking to abolish the action for breach of promise, but none of them became law.

In fact the whole subject of Breach of Promise was not examined again until the Law Commission, published its Report, entitled Breach of Promise of Marriage, in 1969.

The Commission considered that the law gave opportunity for claims of “gold-digging”. (This is the reason why legal aid was never made available for such actions.) The Commission also referred to the argument that … “the stability of marriages is so important to society that the law should not countenance rights of action the threat of which may push people into marriages which they would not otherwise undertake”.

The Commission, whilst conceding that this threat might not be a major factor in practice, stated: “If, as we believe, it is important that parties should be free to terminate an engagement, then it can hardly be thought desirable to retain the contractual effects of an agreement to marry”.

The result of the Commission was a recommendation to abolish the action for breach of promise, replacing it by a procedure for settling property disputes between the parties.

The Commission stated:

“The special relationship between engaged couples may lead them to enter into informal transactions concerning the acquisition or improvement of property, whether owned or purchased by one party or by both, and whether intended for their common use or otherwise. Such transactions will often be very similar in nature to those between married persons. There is a strong case for applying the same principles of law to disputes between ex-fiancés as those which apply to disputes between husband and wife”.

The Commission accordingly recommended that the procedure under section 17 of the Married Women's Property Act 1882* for resolving property disputes between spouses should be extended to engaged couples.

The Commission referred to the case where one spouse contributed money or money's worth to the improvement of the other's property (or the property of them both) and the contribution was of a substantial nature, he or she could acquire a beneficial interest in the property. It considered that this recommendation – which was implemented by section 37 of the Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970– should apply equally to engaged couples, it now does and is included in section 2 of the English Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1970.

It also stated that there must have been a definite agreement to marry. Once such an agreement existed, however, the conduct of the parties before the engagement would be relevant.

With regard to gifts – the engagement ring being the most obvious example – the Commission recommended that the donor…“should not be prevented from recovering a gift on termination of the agreement by reason of the fact that he (or she) was responsible for the termination”.

The Commission made no recommendation with regard to gifts from third parties on the basis that it was outside the scope of the Report. It noted that the law in this connection…”is like the whole field of law concerning ‘unjust enrichment’, far from clear”.

So if a leap year approaches be careful about making promises.

PS. If a lady asks a gentleman to marry her, who buys the engagement ring?

David Simon

Family Law Partner

Glaisyers solicitors

Printing House Street, B4 5DZ

Tel: 0121 233 2971

e-mail: davidsimon@glaisyers.co.uk